In defence of the licence fee as a principle

It has been proposed that the licence fee, which not only covers the BBC but also ITV and Channel Four, could be abolished in just 7 years' time. Even though this would make it easier to access terrestrial channels at first, the consequences for public media which can be held to account will be disastrous.

 The licence fee was invented for a very good reason-to ensure that public television and radio in Britain could be supported by those who wanted to enjoy it but without unfairly taxing those who could not afford a television and radio or, in this digital age of ours, consider both unnecessary when a laptop can function as both a television and a radio, and simultaneously. It also ensures that private television companies such as Sky and Netflix do not have an excessively unfair commercial advantage in the media market, meaning it can ensure there is at least a little balance in media coverage, especially given the dominance of just five billionaires across much of the steadily declining, but still significant,UK newspaper market. The Conservatives' determination to scrap the licence fee is clearly an attack on press freedom and democracy, and therefore the licence fee must be defended. A better media balance is what is needed for media reform, not the scrapping of the licence fee.

 Therefore, the licence fee should not be scrapped but it should be kept so that public terrestrial television and radio is able to compete more competitively with Netflix and Sky; reduction in excessive pay at the top executive level will also allow a reduction in the licence fee meaning it can be a more equitable service for everyone.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

My analysis of the Swedish general election of 2022

The Swedish general election of 2022 generated some surprising results, despite also averting pollsters' predictions significantly. The last three years in particular proved to be a rough ride for the Social Democrat led governments of Stefan Lofven and Magdalena Andersson respectively. Although Sweden's laxer approach to the COVID-19 pandemic (compared to most countries in Europe, which imposed lockdowns during much of 2020 and 2021, an approach that arguably caused more problems than it solved) proved effective, Mr Lofven's desire to lift the austerity tax (which only affected a wealthy minority, similar in nature to the wealth tax initiative of former French President Francois Hollande) and to join NATO proved contentious, with two of the Social Democrats' former coalition partners (the Swedish Greens and Swedish Left Party, who had both pulled out of confidence and supply) unsurprisingly voting against Swedish accession to NATO membership (all other parties in the R
Read more

On the 2020 Serbian election: Why a boycott will only worsen things there

First of all, I apologise for the recent hiatus; however elections are still postponed or on hold in many countries, including the UK. Serbia, however, was able to proceed with its 2020 general election amidst this crisis. Its overall result proved reminiscent of Hungarian elections under Viktor Orban's tenure (2010-present), since the leading national-conservative coalition, the SNS (Progressive Party of Serbia) coalition led by Serbian President Aleksander Vucic (Ana Brnabic is the Serbian Prime Minister, and the first woman and openly homosexual person to hold that position), polled 61.6% of the vote, giving them as many as 191 seats out of 250 and a majority of as high as 132, almost unheard of in any country with proportional representation. Press freedom has endured significant curbs since President Vucic first came into power as Serbian PM in 2012 (he became President of Serbia in 2017), as have civil liberties of Serbs in general. Nepotism and corruption in the Serbian
Read more

On the Spanish regional elections of 2023-a warning for progressives

The Spanish regional elections of 2023, especially those in the "Empty Spain" regions far west of the federal capital of Madrid and prosperous yet famously rebellious Catalonia, resulted in a sharp shift towards conservatism and conservative populism. Both Partido Popular (PP, Spain's equivalent of the Conservatives) and Vox (the Spanish equivalent of Reform UK/UKIP) made sweeping gains in all regions, notably taking overall control in Madrid (normally an impossible feat under Spain's PR system), more than doubling their seat total in Valencia to top the poll there, and wresting control of Asturias, La Rioja, and Cantabria from the Spanish Socialist Workers' Party (PSOE, Spain's equivalent of Labour) and the Cantabrian Regionalist Party respectively. Under the tenure of Pedro Sanchez, the current PSOE-Podemos coalition is floundering and has not done much to ensure Spain's recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic since the last restrictions ended in 2021, and P
Read more