Psephology series, part 5: How to avoid and stop gerrymandering
Yesterday, the United States Supreme Court voted 5-4 not to impose federal standards to stop redistricting of US congressional districts in such a way as to favour one party-otherwise known by the popular term gerrymandering: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/jun/27/supreme-court-gerrymandering-dissent-elena-kagan
This dereliction of duty has unsurprisingly attracted heavy criticism, especially Elena Kagan whose dissent received international attention. Gerrymandering, usually found in countries using first past the post for elections, is an affront to democracy around the world as it undermines free and fair elections and divides nations.
The United Kingdom has a Boundary Commission, independent from Parliament, and Local Government Boundary Commissions, also independent from Parliament, which supposedly limits gerrymandering; the United States of America has neither at a federal level. However, at a local government level, it can unintentionally happen when political parties submit plans focused too much on electoral equality and not enough on community ties, especially where councils require a uniform pattern of wards. A failure by Labour to engage with the constituency boundary review for the 1983 general election was a significant factor in the creation of such constituencies as Cannock & Burntwood, Colchester South & Maldon, Clwyd South West, and North Bedfordshire, of those constituencies extant from 1983 to 1997 not forced by the new local government boundaries.
Here are tips for thwarting de facto gerrymanders in a first past the post system, a Single Transferable Vote system, or a proportional representation system involving a FPTP element:
1. Keep a regular eye on relevant Boundary Commission websites. In England this is the LGBCE website, which can be found at: www.lgbce.org.uk. If your local area is having a ward boundary review, always respond-this applies in whichever country you live in, as the Republic of Ireland has regular boundary reviews as well. Countries using Mixed Member Proportional Representation also have regular boundary reviews of their single member constituencies e.g. Germany.
2. If a poor boundary proposal appears, suggest a plausible alternative. Boundary Commissions will stick to initial proposals, even poorly thought out ones, unless an alternative is proposed and/or reasons why the initial suggestion should be scrapped are acted upon. Evidence of community ties and barriers are good reasons to suggest alternative wards and/or constituencies.
3. Alert interested people to the boundary review. Fair representation is important in a democracy, so making sure communities and areas are whenever possible not divided between different representatives is crucial.
This dereliction of duty has unsurprisingly attracted heavy criticism, especially Elena Kagan whose dissent received international attention. Gerrymandering, usually found in countries using first past the post for elections, is an affront to democracy around the world as it undermines free and fair elections and divides nations.
The United Kingdom has a Boundary Commission, independent from Parliament, and Local Government Boundary Commissions, also independent from Parliament, which supposedly limits gerrymandering; the United States of America has neither at a federal level. However, at a local government level, it can unintentionally happen when political parties submit plans focused too much on electoral equality and not enough on community ties, especially where councils require a uniform pattern of wards. A failure by Labour to engage with the constituency boundary review for the 1983 general election was a significant factor in the creation of such constituencies as Cannock & Burntwood, Colchester South & Maldon, Clwyd South West, and North Bedfordshire, of those constituencies extant from 1983 to 1997 not forced by the new local government boundaries.
Here are tips for thwarting de facto gerrymanders in a first past the post system, a Single Transferable Vote system, or a proportional representation system involving a FPTP element:
1. Keep a regular eye on relevant Boundary Commission websites. In England this is the LGBCE website, which can be found at: www.lgbce.org.uk. If your local area is having a ward boundary review, always respond-this applies in whichever country you live in, as the Republic of Ireland has regular boundary reviews as well. Countries using Mixed Member Proportional Representation also have regular boundary reviews of their single member constituencies e.g. Germany.
2. If a poor boundary proposal appears, suggest a plausible alternative. Boundary Commissions will stick to initial proposals, even poorly thought out ones, unless an alternative is proposed and/or reasons why the initial suggestion should be scrapped are acted upon. Evidence of community ties and barriers are good reasons to suggest alternative wards and/or constituencies.
3. Alert interested people to the boundary review. Fair representation is important in a democracy, so making sure communities and areas are whenever possible not divided between different representatives is crucial.
Comments
Post a Comment