Psephology series, part 4: why European elections are better under Sainte-League than d'Hondt

Earlier today, the full list of candidates for European elections in the UK was announced by each region.

Some opinion polls have been conducted on each of the largest seven parties (i.e. the Brexit Party, Change UK, Conservative, Green, Labour, Liberal Democrats and UKIP), who have submitted lists everywhere in Britain. However, seat projections should not be calculated at this stage as each party's regional support varies widely, as do the number of seats per region.

Which brings us to this interesting question in psephology: how would it look if we used Sainte-League instead of d'Hondt?

Sainte-League's key difference from d'Hondt is that when it comes to allocating seats to political parties, the divisor 2n+1, where n is the number of seats a party has already won within a round of allocation, is used instead of n+1. This means that when determining who gets the remaining seats in a PR constituency after the first set of seats have been allocated, the party's votes are divided by 3, 5, 7 etc. instead of 2, 3, 4, meaning that smaller parties are more likely to win seats.

How would this have affected European elections in Britain? Let us take the London constituency as an example, given that it had the most lists (17) in 2014:

Labour received 36.67% in that European Parliament constituency in 2014, the Conservatives 22.52%, UKIP 16.87%, the Greens 8.93%, the Liberal Democrats 6.73%, and the others polled too low to win a seat under any PR system.

With this, the d'Hondt allocation was:  4 Labour, 2 Conservative,1 UKIP, 1 Green.

1st seat: Labour (36.67%; 36.67/2= 18.335)
2nd seat: Conservatives (22.52%; 22.52/2=11.26)
3rd seat: Labour (18.335; 36.67/3=12.223)
4th seat: UKIP (16.87%; 16.87/2=8.435)
5th seat: Labour (12.223; 36.67/4=9.1675)
6th seat: Conservative (11.26; 22.52/3=7.506)
7th seat: Labour (9.1675; 36.67/5=7.334)
8th seat: Green (8.93)

The Sainte-League allocation, by contrast, would have gone as follows:

1st seat: Labour (36.67; 36.67/3=12.223)
2nd seat: Conservatives (22.52; 22.52/3=7.506)
3rd seat: UKIP (16.87; 16.87/3=5.623)
4th seat: Labour (12.223; 36.67/5=7.334)
5th seat: Green (8.93; 8.93/3=2.977)
6th seat: Conservatives (7.506; 22.52/5=4.504)
7th seat: Labour (7.334; 36.67/7=5.239)
8th seat: Liberal Democrats (6.73)

Making a hypothetical Sainte-League allocation in London: 3 Labour, 2 Conservatives, 1 UKIP, 1 Green, and 1 Liberal Democrat.

D'Hondt clearly favours larger parties simply because of mathematics, since they will get the extra seats first. In regional constituencies this can effectively disfranchise large numbers of voters.

There would be more Green MEPs under Sainte-League than d'Hondt at every election, especially in 2009, and in general the election would have been more proportional. Labour won half the European seats in London in 2014 despite winning only 36.67% of the vote, which is not that proportionate at all. Under Sainte-League, used in German elections, seats will be more evenly allocated. As coalitions are not necessary for European elections, they should be as proportional as possible. D'Hondt also makes smaller PR constituencies disproportional in practice, as seen in North East England and the East Midlands in particular.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

My analysis of local by-elections from 22/11/18

Readers, the results of this week's British local by-elections were as follows: Enfield LBC, Bush Hill Park: Conservative 1540 (52.4%, +12.7%), Labour 828 (28.2%, -8.3%), Liberal Democrats 313 (10.7%, -0.8%), Green 127 (4.3%, -6.6%), WEP 79 (2.7%), Independent (Oyaloyu) 50 (1.7%). [UKIP did not stand] Westminster LBC, Lancaster Gate: Conservative 913 (47.2%, -1.5%), Labour 684 (35.4%, -1.0%), Liberal Democrats 275 (14.2%, -0.7%), Green 62 (3.2%). Windsor & Maidenhead UA, Datchet: Conservative 525 (56.0%, -3.1%), National Flood Prevention Party 223 (23.8%), Labour 121 (12.9%, -9.1%), Liberal Democrats 48 (5.1%,-13.8%), Green 21 (2.2%). Wirral MBC, Upton: Labour 1490 (61.3%, +3.1%), Conservative 705 (29.0%, +0.4%), Green 151 (6.2%, -0.5%), Liberal Democrats 83 (3.4%, -0.8%). [TUSC did not stand] All changes are since May. The open divisions in the Conservatives, which resulted in a failed attempt to call for a vote of no confidence in Theresa May by the European Researc...
Read more

On the 2020 Serbian election: Why a boycott will only worsen things there

First of all, I apologise for the recent hiatus; however elections are still postponed or on hold in many countries, including the UK. Serbia, however, was able to proceed with its 2020 general election amidst this crisis. Its overall result proved reminiscent of Hungarian elections under Viktor Orban's tenure (2010-present), since the leading national-conservative coalition, the SNS (Progressive Party of Serbia) coalition led by Serbian President Aleksander Vucic (Ana Brnabic is the Serbian Prime Minister, and the first woman and openly homosexual person to hold that position), polled 61.6% of the vote, giving them as many as 191 seats out of 250 and a majority of as high as 132, almost unheard of in any country with proportional representation. Press freedom has endured significant curbs since President Vucic first came into power as Serbian PM in 2012 (he became President of Serbia in 2017), as have civil liberties of Serbs in general. Nepotism and corruption in the Serbian ...
Read more

On the French local elections of 2020: Vive le surge de vert!

The French local elections finally concluded yesterday, having been originally scheduled to take place on 15 March; they were postponed due to the effects of the ongoing coronavirus pandemic.  The most sensational story of these elections was the many triumphs by the main French Green Party, Europe Ecologie-Les Verts (EELV). In major French cities (those with more than 100,000 people), EELV captured the mayoralties of Annecy, Besancon, Bordeaux, Lyon, Marseille, Strasbourg, and Tours. They also performed impressively in the munciipal elections for those cities as well. However, in the midst of all this triumph there was one notable setback for them: Eric Pollie, the first Green Mayor of a major French city, decided to contest the mayoral election there as an "Independent Left" (divers gauche) candidate instead. Furthermore they narrowly missed out on unseating former PS leader Martine Aubry from her post as Mayor of Lille; in the second round she held on by 227 votes, a sig...
Read more