Why the vote of no confidence result will actually hasten the Conservative government's demise

Theresa May survived a vote of no confidence yesterday by Conservative MPs-but the margin, 200-117, still puts the Conservatives in big trouble in the long term. 36.9% of MPs voted against Theresa May, including the majority of Conservative backbenchers.

Why did it fail in spite of the chaos over the Brexit deal?

Theresa May is one of the worst Prime Ministers in British history, make no mistake. But unlike with John Redwood's challenge to John Major, which actually failed by a larger margin (89 votes to John Major's 218), a contest between Eurosceptics and pro-Europeans within the Conservative Party, there were and are no credible challengers to Theresa May despite pollsters claiming there are and despite Mrs May being widely perceived as incompetent. The alternatives frequently cited have no notably different or useful vision (e.g. Sajid Javid), are too divisive despite name recognition (e.g. Boris Johnson), are more extreme than Theresa May in terms of a Brexit outlook and would prefer a disastrous no-deal Brexit on principle (e.g. Jacob Rees-Mogg), or have no real credibility (e.g. Geoffrey Cox, cited as a possible outsider challenger were Mrs May to lose the VONC). Also, many Conservative MPs just did not want any more internal and external uncertainty than that already caused by Brexit and Brexit-related issues.

Could not a pro-European and pro-Remain Conservative MP have simply issued a leadership challenge to Theresa May over the bad Brexit deal?

Unlike in the 1990s there simply are not enough pro-Remain and definite pro-EU Conservative MPs to make any such challenge in practice. Such a hypothetical challenge by Anna Soubry, for example, would fail badly. Most pro-European moderates in the UK, who would be Conservatives in earlier times, are now in fact Liberal Democrats or supporters thereof.
 Why will this result in fact hasten this government's downfall?

The result means that Theresa May cannot face a vote of no confidence for at least another year (this is different from a vote of no confidence in the government itself, by the way!). However at the same time the margin of the result means that the Brexit deal as it currently stands has no chance of passing through Parliament, as neither hardline Brexiteers nor pro-European Conservative MPs will support it, and no opposition MPs will support the deal either. This will in turn lead to just more internal and external chaos, which will likely lead to an early general election in 2019 that the Conservatives even on current polling will clearly lose.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The English local elections of 2023-Conservatives pay the penalty for failing to put a stop to sleaze and sewage in our rivers

The English local elections of 2023 (Northern Ireland's elections will finish next week and a separate blog post will be devoted to these) not only resulted in more than 1000 Conservative losses just as Rallings & Thrasher and Sir John Curtice predicted, they also resulted in sweeping Green and Liberal Democrat gains across the nation-sending a hard message to the Conservatives about the need to protect our environment and Labour for barely acting like an opposition at all. The Conservatives in total made a net loss of 1,061 seats, with the vast majority being in the shire districts where they once dominated-even councils such as Bracknell Forest and Surrey Heath, which they held in 1995 and 2019, fell, to Labour and the Liberal Democrats respectively in those two cases. Who they lost to varied widely by the nature of the authority-their losses to Labour came mainly in (ex) industrial "Red Wall" areas where they had made against-the-trend gains in 2019 or fared better
Read more

My analysis of the Swedish general election of 2022

The Swedish general election of 2022 generated some surprising results, despite also averting pollsters' predictions significantly. The last three years in particular proved to be a rough ride for the Social Democrat led governments of Stefan Lofven and Magdalena Andersson respectively. Although Sweden's laxer approach to the COVID-19 pandemic (compared to most countries in Europe, which imposed lockdowns during much of 2020 and 2021, an approach that arguably caused more problems than it solved) proved effective, Mr Lofven's desire to lift the austerity tax (which only affected a wealthy minority, similar in nature to the wealth tax initiative of former French President Francois Hollande) and to join NATO proved contentious, with two of the Social Democrats' former coalition partners (the Swedish Greens and Swedish Left Party, who had both pulled out of confidence and supply) unsurprisingly voting against Swedish accession to NATO membership (all other parties in the R
Read more

On the 2020 Serbian election: Why a boycott will only worsen things there

First of all, I apologise for the recent hiatus; however elections are still postponed or on hold in many countries, including the UK. Serbia, however, was able to proceed with its 2020 general election amidst this crisis. Its overall result proved reminiscent of Hungarian elections under Viktor Orban's tenure (2010-present), since the leading national-conservative coalition, the SNS (Progressive Party of Serbia) coalition led by Serbian President Aleksander Vucic (Ana Brnabic is the Serbian Prime Minister, and the first woman and openly homosexual person to hold that position), polled 61.6% of the vote, giving them as many as 191 seats out of 250 and a majority of as high as 132, almost unheard of in any country with proportional representation. Press freedom has endured significant curbs since President Vucic first came into power as Serbian PM in 2012 (he became President of Serbia in 2017), as have civil liberties of Serbs in general. Nepotism and corruption in the Serbian
Read more