Why there must never be any Liberal Democrat-Green Party merger-a refutation of Messrs Tyrone and Rentoul

Last week in the Spectator, Nick Tyrone hinted that a merger between the Liberal Democrats and the Green Party could happen within this decade, and in the Independent, John Rentoul suggested the exact same thing.

Despite their claims, a merger between the Liberal Democrats and the Green Party would in fact be a very bad idea politically, especially for the Green Party. Here is why:

1. The Green Party can reach out to many areas the Liberal Democrats cannot. This was particularly noticeable in the 2019 local elections, where the Greens managed a net gain (notionally due to extensive ward boundary changes in many areas, in addition to council mergers) of 148 seats from the Conservatives, and mainly in rural areas and small towns where the Liberal Democrats are not competitive. Most of the Green gains from Labour that year were in areas with high qualification levels but not high affluence (such as Norwich and the southern parts of Royal Leamington Spa) that are only competitive between the Greens and Labour. Likewise, the majority of the 31 saved Green Party deposits at the 2019 general election which were not included in the "Unite to Remain" alliance were in constituencies where the Liberal Democrats had no chance of winning.

2. The Green Party is a genuine alternative to the Conservatives and Labour; the Liberal Democrats have proved themselves not to be. This is not just in relation to the Liberal Democrats' time in coalition with the Conservatives from 2010-15, but also in relation to their poor record on environmental and social justice issues in the European Parliament before we left the EU on 31 January 2020, and the Liberal Democrats' effective espousal of "permanent austerity" in their 2019 general election manifesto. Post-Brexit, there is no evidence they have changed.

3. The Green Party knows and understands that systematic change is needed to tackle the climate emergency. By comparison, the Liberal Democrats merely want to tinker at the edges of the fundamentally broken system that is neoliberalism, whose constant demand for growth cannot deal with the climate emergency. Fundamental socioeconomic change is needed to create the green society and circular, more localised economy that the Green Party campaigns for, which is what is needed to tackle the climate emergency in the long term.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The English local elections of 2023-Conservatives pay the penalty for failing to put a stop to sleaze and sewage in our rivers

The English local elections of 2023 (Northern Ireland's elections will finish next week and a separate blog post will be devoted to these) not only resulted in more than 1000 Conservative losses just as Rallings & Thrasher and Sir John Curtice predicted, they also resulted in sweeping Green and Liberal Democrat gains across the nation-sending a hard message to the Conservatives about the need to protect our environment and Labour for barely acting like an opposition at all. The Conservatives in total made a net loss of 1,061 seats, with the vast majority being in the shire districts where they once dominated-even councils such as Bracknell Forest and Surrey Heath, which they held in 1995 and 2019, fell, to Labour and the Liberal Democrats respectively in those two cases. Who they lost to varied widely by the nature of the authority-their losses to Labour came mainly in (ex) industrial "Red Wall" areas where they had made against-the-trend gains in 2019 or fared better
Read more

My analysis of the Swedish general election of 2022

The Swedish general election of 2022 generated some surprising results, despite also averting pollsters' predictions significantly. The last three years in particular proved to be a rough ride for the Social Democrat led governments of Stefan Lofven and Magdalena Andersson respectively. Although Sweden's laxer approach to the COVID-19 pandemic (compared to most countries in Europe, which imposed lockdowns during much of 2020 and 2021, an approach that arguably caused more problems than it solved) proved effective, Mr Lofven's desire to lift the austerity tax (which only affected a wealthy minority, similar in nature to the wealth tax initiative of former French President Francois Hollande) and to join NATO proved contentious, with two of the Social Democrats' former coalition partners (the Swedish Greens and Swedish Left Party, who had both pulled out of confidence and supply) unsurprisingly voting against Swedish accession to NATO membership (all other parties in the R
Read more

On the 2020 Serbian election: Why a boycott will only worsen things there

First of all, I apologise for the recent hiatus; however elections are still postponed or on hold in many countries, including the UK. Serbia, however, was able to proceed with its 2020 general election amidst this crisis. Its overall result proved reminiscent of Hungarian elections under Viktor Orban's tenure (2010-present), since the leading national-conservative coalition, the SNS (Progressive Party of Serbia) coalition led by Serbian President Aleksander Vucic (Ana Brnabic is the Serbian Prime Minister, and the first woman and openly homosexual person to hold that position), polled 61.6% of the vote, giving them as many as 191 seats out of 250 and a majority of as high as 132, almost unheard of in any country with proportional representation. Press freedom has endured significant curbs since President Vucic first came into power as Serbian PM in 2012 (he became President of Serbia in 2017), as have civil liberties of Serbs in general. Nepotism and corruption in the Serbian
Read more