Why the right to roam is important

The current Conservative-led government is proposing, this autumn, to bring in new legislation that would make trespass a criminal offence, as opposed to a civil one in most cases (exceptions include the railway, for example). This follows on from when squatting in residential buildings was made a criminal offence in 2012, when it was previously a civil offence.

This would not only breach the human rights of travelling communities (including Roma and Irish Travellers) but would also jeopardise the right to demonstrate, the right to enjoy the countryside, and severely hamper our access to nature given that only 8.5% of UK land is publicly owned; conversely nearly half of UK land is owned by aristocrats or corporations, amounting to just 25,000 landowners. Even most homeowners own very little land at all.

People need to be able to have access to nature, especially since one in eight UK households have no garden or access to one; these households are concentrated in major cities. Scotland has a right to roam but this is more limited in England and Wales, and almost nonexistent in Northern Ireland in practice.

The right to roam allows access to public or privately owned land for camping, exercise, hiking and walking as long as those accessing it do not disturb wildlife or nature. With high levels of obesity (15% of UK adults are obese on conservative estimates), and the COVID-19 crisis hitting hardest in metropolitan areas, access to the countryside is vital for everyone. The right to roam will also help people acquire a long-term respect for nature, and ensure healthier, longer lives.

The limited right to roam, as specified in the Countryside and Rights of Way Act 2000, needs to be extended to the extent it exists in Scotland and in the majority of Northern Europe. 




Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The English local elections of 2023-Conservatives pay the penalty for failing to put a stop to sleaze and sewage in our rivers

The English local elections of 2023 (Northern Ireland's elections will finish next week and a separate blog post will be devoted to these) not only resulted in more than 1000 Conservative losses just as Rallings & Thrasher and Sir John Curtice predicted, they also resulted in sweeping Green and Liberal Democrat gains across the nation-sending a hard message to the Conservatives about the need to protect our environment and Labour for barely acting like an opposition at all. The Conservatives in total made a net loss of 1,061 seats, with the vast majority being in the shire districts where they once dominated-even councils such as Bracknell Forest and Surrey Heath, which they held in 1995 and 2019, fell, to Labour and the Liberal Democrats respectively in those two cases. Who they lost to varied widely by the nature of the authority-their losses to Labour came mainly in (ex) industrial "Red Wall" areas where they had made against-the-trend gains in 2019 or fared better
Read more

My analysis of the Swedish general election of 2022

The Swedish general election of 2022 generated some surprising results, despite also averting pollsters' predictions significantly. The last three years in particular proved to be a rough ride for the Social Democrat led governments of Stefan Lofven and Magdalena Andersson respectively. Although Sweden's laxer approach to the COVID-19 pandemic (compared to most countries in Europe, which imposed lockdowns during much of 2020 and 2021, an approach that arguably caused more problems than it solved) proved effective, Mr Lofven's desire to lift the austerity tax (which only affected a wealthy minority, similar in nature to the wealth tax initiative of former French President Francois Hollande) and to join NATO proved contentious, with two of the Social Democrats' former coalition partners (the Swedish Greens and Swedish Left Party, who had both pulled out of confidence and supply) unsurprisingly voting against Swedish accession to NATO membership (all other parties in the R
Read more

On the 2020 Serbian election: Why a boycott will only worsen things there

First of all, I apologise for the recent hiatus; however elections are still postponed or on hold in many countries, including the UK. Serbia, however, was able to proceed with its 2020 general election amidst this crisis. Its overall result proved reminiscent of Hungarian elections under Viktor Orban's tenure (2010-present), since the leading national-conservative coalition, the SNS (Progressive Party of Serbia) coalition led by Serbian President Aleksander Vucic (Ana Brnabic is the Serbian Prime Minister, and the first woman and openly homosexual person to hold that position), polled 61.6% of the vote, giving them as many as 191 seats out of 250 and a majority of as high as 132, almost unheard of in any country with proportional representation. Press freedom has endured significant curbs since President Vucic first came into power as Serbian PM in 2012 (he became President of Serbia in 2017), as have civil liberties of Serbs in general. Nepotism and corruption in the Serbian
Read more