Why a green transport revolution will be especially good for people with disabilities

The Independent reported today that an accessibility fund to help train stations and underground stations more accessible for people with disabilities is being cut by half over the next five years- despite the fact that only one in five train stations/underground stations in Britain have step free access, and widely used stations like Highbury & Islington, Putney, and Moorfields (Liverpool) are still not accessible for users of wheelchairs or mobility scooters. Accessibility problems are still widespread on other forms of public transport (buses and trams) as well, as Channel Four famously reported last year.

The fact that our transport system is still biased towards the car, and the fact that most 'public transport' is actually in private profiteers' hands, means that people with disabilities (physical or mental) face significant difficulties in travelling on a daily basis, particularly in less urban areas. The majority of people with significant disabilities are not able to drive for medical or financial reasons (the unemployment rate amongst people with disabilities is 50% on average)-notable in rural areas where public transport is very limited on average in comparison to large towns or cities. Mobility-adapted cars are in any case expensive, and the costs of using public transport have been rising out of line with inflation or wage increases.

As a Green activist with a disability reliant on public transport, I can say that my fellow Greens' transport policy will greatly help the lives of people with disabilities. Here is how:

1. We will help make sure that public transport of all types (railways, buses etc.) is returned to public hands, which will lower fares and also mean that funding for public transport is usefully used to improve it and make it more accessible for disabled travellers.
2. We will thus help rural and semi-urban areas become less car-reliant and easier for cyclists, which will also improve the employment prospects of people with disabilities significantly and make them safer for vulnerable travellers.
3. Our policy of helping roll out 20 mph speed limits in most residential areas is helping make (and will continue to help make) roads safer for people with disabilities, especially users of wheelchairs/mobility scooters and people who are blind and/or deaf, or otherwise significantly visually/auditorially impaired.

With this, I believe that we Greens should help continue to widen our appeal to voters with disabilities and thus help them vote out the coalition government that has been persecuting people with disabilities, making their lives a misery, and that is responsible for thousands of premature deaths of people with disabilities and/or mental health problems.

Alan.

 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

My analysis of local by-elections from 22/11/18

Readers, the results of this week's British local by-elections were as follows: Enfield LBC, Bush Hill Park: Conservative 1540 (52.4%, +12.7%), Labour 828 (28.2%, -8.3%), Liberal Democrats 313 (10.7%, -0.8%), Green 127 (4.3%, -6.6%), WEP 79 (2.7%), Independent (Oyaloyu) 50 (1.7%). [UKIP did not stand] Westminster LBC, Lancaster Gate: Conservative 913 (47.2%, -1.5%), Labour 684 (35.4%, -1.0%), Liberal Democrats 275 (14.2%, -0.7%), Green 62 (3.2%). Windsor & Maidenhead UA, Datchet: Conservative 525 (56.0%, -3.1%), National Flood Prevention Party 223 (23.8%), Labour 121 (12.9%, -9.1%), Liberal Democrats 48 (5.1%,-13.8%), Green 21 (2.2%). Wirral MBC, Upton: Labour 1490 (61.3%, +3.1%), Conservative 705 (29.0%, +0.4%), Green 151 (6.2%, -0.5%), Liberal Democrats 83 (3.4%, -0.8%). [TUSC did not stand] All changes are since May. The open divisions in the Conservatives, which resulted in a failed attempt to call for a vote of no confidence in Theresa May by the European Researc...
Read more

On the 2020 Serbian election: Why a boycott will only worsen things there

First of all, I apologise for the recent hiatus; however elections are still postponed or on hold in many countries, including the UK. Serbia, however, was able to proceed with its 2020 general election amidst this crisis. Its overall result proved reminiscent of Hungarian elections under Viktor Orban's tenure (2010-present), since the leading national-conservative coalition, the SNS (Progressive Party of Serbia) coalition led by Serbian President Aleksander Vucic (Ana Brnabic is the Serbian Prime Minister, and the first woman and openly homosexual person to hold that position), polled 61.6% of the vote, giving them as many as 191 seats out of 250 and a majority of as high as 132, almost unheard of in any country with proportional representation. Press freedom has endured significant curbs since President Vucic first came into power as Serbian PM in 2012 (he became President of Serbia in 2017), as have civil liberties of Serbs in general. Nepotism and corruption in the Serbian ...
Read more

On the French local elections of 2020: Vive le surge de vert!

The French local elections finally concluded yesterday, having been originally scheduled to take place on 15 March; they were postponed due to the effects of the ongoing coronavirus pandemic.  The most sensational story of these elections was the many triumphs by the main French Green Party, Europe Ecologie-Les Verts (EELV). In major French cities (those with more than 100,000 people), EELV captured the mayoralties of Annecy, Besancon, Bordeaux, Lyon, Marseille, Strasbourg, and Tours. They also performed impressively in the munciipal elections for those cities as well. However, in the midst of all this triumph there was one notable setback for them: Eric Pollie, the first Green Mayor of a major French city, decided to contest the mayoral election there as an "Independent Left" (divers gauche) candidate instead. Furthermore they narrowly missed out on unseating former PS leader Martine Aubry from her post as Mayor of Lille; in the second round she held on by 227 votes, a sig...
Read more