My tribute to Mikhail Gorbachev

 Mikhail Gorbachev, the last leader of the USSR, died yesterday.

Like many of his contemporaries behind the former Iron Curtain, Mr Gorbachev grew up in humble surroundings, his parents working on collective farms in rural Russia. He rose through the ranks of the CPSU (Communist Party of the Soviet Union) to reach the Politburo in 1980, just five years before he became Secretary-General (de facto leader of the USSR). He was expected to succeed Yuri Andropov upon Mr Andropov's death in 1984, but Konstantin Chernenko was selected instead. Mr Chernenko died the following year and Mikhail Gorbachev finally achieved the position he needed to implement his reform programme, under the terms glasnost ("openness") and perestroika ("restructuring").

Ironically, in trying to modernise the USSR with those reforms, he brought about its demise. Not only were Russians increasingly tired of the whole planned economic system, but leaders in other Iron Curtain countries (especially East Germany and Romania) were unwilling to change or adapt. Janos Kadar in Hungary had started doing so earlier, but its initial success was fading fast. Democratic reforms paved the way for radical reformers like Boris Yeltsin, who succeeded Mr Gorbachev as leader of Russia after the USSR's demise, and greater (if limited) economic freedoms ultimately saw demands for an end to the centralised economic system, spurred on by revolutions across nations behind the Iron Curtain, starting with the success of Solidarity in Poland under Lech Walesa and ending with the independence of the Baltic states of Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania. During that same time period (1989-1991), African countries that had adopted socialist systems with planned economies abandoned them, and many communist parties elsewhere in the world disbanded. Also, via negotiations with Ronald Reagan and later George H. Bush, he brought about the end of the Cold War and the Warsaw Pact, paving the way for lasting peace at long last. 

Ultimately, his reforms were too little, too late, and the USSR finally dissolved on 25 December 1991.

In causing the demise of the Soviet Union, Mr Gorbachev effectively brought true democracy to Russia for the first time, although not without a few hiccups to say the least. It was not to last, though-Mr Yeltsin proved ineffective as a Russian President and ever since Vladimir Putin took office in 2000, Russia has slipped back into autocracy and authoritarianism, with its elections being widely regarded as neither free nor fair by any standards, even those of the 1991 and 1996 Russian Presidential elections which were marred by irregularities. Mr Gorbachev's attempt at a political comeback failed disastrously; he polled just 0.5% of the vote in 1996, and made no further attempts to return to Russian politics other than as a critic of President Putin's regime.

So farewell, Mr Gorbachev. Even though the freedoms in Russia you wanted to bring about ultimately did not last there even if the failed centralised economic system never returned, the world has become a freer and more peaceful place overall in the long-term due to your efforts.

Mikhail Sergeyevich Gorbachev, born 2 March 1931, departed this life on 30 August 2022, aged 91 years.

 

Comments

  1. Sandy Irvine31 August 2022 at 12:21

    While we owe him a deep debt of gratitude regarding peace and detente, it would be wrong to overlook his shameful role during the Chernobyl disaster, several economic blunders, and, latterly, his support for Russian aggression in Crimea. He was no friend if real democracy. But his role in reducing potentially lethal Cold War tensions does buy him a lot of credit in history’s ‘bank’.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Alan B31 August 2022 at 21:32

      Whilst he certainly had some role in the Chernobyl disaster, the damage had already been done by this point by failures to reform the whole system and a deeply embedded culture of internal blame which hindered genuine problem-solving (just like with the Russian economy in general). His support for Russian aggression in Crimea, as well as his desperate and futile attempts to thwart independence from the USSR by Latvia, Lithuania et al., was primarily symptomatic of his desire to keep Russia as he knew it intact more than anything else.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The English local elections of 2023-Conservatives pay the penalty for failing to put a stop to sleaze and sewage in our rivers

The English local elections of 2023 (Northern Ireland's elections will finish next week and a separate blog post will be devoted to these) not only resulted in more than 1000 Conservative losses just as Rallings & Thrasher and Sir John Curtice predicted, they also resulted in sweeping Green and Liberal Democrat gains across the nation-sending a hard message to the Conservatives about the need to protect our environment and Labour for barely acting like an opposition at all. The Conservatives in total made a net loss of 1,061 seats, with the vast majority being in the shire districts where they once dominated-even councils such as Bracknell Forest and Surrey Heath, which they held in 1995 and 2019, fell, to Labour and the Liberal Democrats respectively in those two cases. Who they lost to varied widely by the nature of the authority-their losses to Labour came mainly in (ex) industrial "Red Wall" areas where they had made against-the-trend gains in 2019 or fared better
Read more

My analysis of the Swedish general election of 2022

The Swedish general election of 2022 generated some surprising results, despite also averting pollsters' predictions significantly. The last three years in particular proved to be a rough ride for the Social Democrat led governments of Stefan Lofven and Magdalena Andersson respectively. Although Sweden's laxer approach to the COVID-19 pandemic (compared to most countries in Europe, which imposed lockdowns during much of 2020 and 2021, an approach that arguably caused more problems than it solved) proved effective, Mr Lofven's desire to lift the austerity tax (which only affected a wealthy minority, similar in nature to the wealth tax initiative of former French President Francois Hollande) and to join NATO proved contentious, with two of the Social Democrats' former coalition partners (the Swedish Greens and Swedish Left Party, who had both pulled out of confidence and supply) unsurprisingly voting against Swedish accession to NATO membership (all other parties in the R
Read more

On the 2020 Serbian election: Why a boycott will only worsen things there

First of all, I apologise for the recent hiatus; however elections are still postponed or on hold in many countries, including the UK. Serbia, however, was able to proceed with its 2020 general election amidst this crisis. Its overall result proved reminiscent of Hungarian elections under Viktor Orban's tenure (2010-present), since the leading national-conservative coalition, the SNS (Progressive Party of Serbia) coalition led by Serbian President Aleksander Vucic (Ana Brnabic is the Serbian Prime Minister, and the first woman and openly homosexual person to hold that position), polled 61.6% of the vote, giving them as many as 191 seats out of 250 and a majority of as high as 132, almost unheard of in any country with proportional representation. Press freedom has endured significant curbs since President Vucic first came into power as Serbian PM in 2012 (he became President of Serbia in 2017), as have civil liberties of Serbs in general. Nepotism and corruption in the Serbian
Read more