Why MPs can easily live on £67,000 per year (when so many people live on far less)

Recently, Conservative MP Malcolm Rifkind, who after being caught in a sting operation by Channel Four will stand down as MP for Kensington (not Kensington and Chelsea, as some broadcasters have erroneously stated; Kensington and Chelsea was actually abolished via boundary changes in 2010; Chelsea was moved to Chelsea and Fulham in those boundary changes) claimed that it was 'unrealistic for MPs to live on £67,000 per year' (the current salary for all United Kingdom MPs)

His remark only shows how out of touch he, and many other MPs (prominent MPs with very lucrative second jobs include Edward Garnier, Conservative MP for Harborough, and former Labour PM Gordon Brown, who is standing down from Kirkcaldy & Cowdenbeath this year) is with the people of Britain-the average wage is only £26,000 per year, and due to the serious income inequalities that exist within Britain the majority earn less than this average rather than more. With £67,000 per year, a person easily could do (some or all of) the following and still get by:

1. Save up to buy a large enough house outright rather than just saving up to put a deposit on a mortgage for a house.
2. Buy a small flat (in the North of England, at least) by saving up for as little as 18 months to 2 years (at least if they were single or were part of a childless couple)
3. Set up a considerable trust fund and/or inheritance for their children over a long period of time (as long as the earner did not overspend; being lucky enough to earn more money than most should not excuse you from self-sacrifice)
4. Move to a more rural area and grow organic food for their family so that they can live off the land and not have to buy from supermarkets.

Furthermore,if the railways and other types of public transport were renationalised and if energy was brought back into public hands, living on an MP's salary alone would be easier still since the then-publicly owned utilities would lower travel costs and energy costs for everyone who used them.

Also, two MPs have proved it is possible to live on considerably less than the Parliamentary salary and still serve their constituents well-former Labour MPs Dave Nellist and Terry Fields, who famously only took the wage of skilled workers at the time whilst in Parliament. This is a good time to remind MPs that they are there to serve constituents and discuss what laws are best for the people of the United Kingdom, not to merely excessively indulge themselves at our expense.

Alan.



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

My analysis of the Swedish general election of 2022

The Swedish general election of 2022 generated some surprising results, despite also averting pollsters' predictions significantly. The last three years in particular proved to be a rough ride for the Social Democrat led governments of Stefan Lofven and Magdalena Andersson respectively. Although Sweden's laxer approach to the COVID-19 pandemic (compared to most countries in Europe, which imposed lockdowns during much of 2020 and 2021, an approach that arguably caused more problems than it solved) proved effective, Mr Lofven's desire to lift the austerity tax (which only affected a wealthy minority, similar in nature to the wealth tax initiative of former French President Francois Hollande) and to join NATO proved contentious, with two of the Social Democrats' former coalition partners (the Swedish Greens and Swedish Left Party, who had both pulled out of confidence and supply) unsurprisingly voting against Swedish accession to NATO membership (all other parties in the R
Read more

On the 2020 Serbian election: Why a boycott will only worsen things there

First of all, I apologise for the recent hiatus; however elections are still postponed or on hold in many countries, including the UK. Serbia, however, was able to proceed with its 2020 general election amidst this crisis. Its overall result proved reminiscent of Hungarian elections under Viktor Orban's tenure (2010-present), since the leading national-conservative coalition, the SNS (Progressive Party of Serbia) coalition led by Serbian President Aleksander Vucic (Ana Brnabic is the Serbian Prime Minister, and the first woman and openly homosexual person to hold that position), polled 61.6% of the vote, giving them as many as 191 seats out of 250 and a majority of as high as 132, almost unheard of in any country with proportional representation. Press freedom has endured significant curbs since President Vucic first came into power as Serbian PM in 2012 (he became President of Serbia in 2017), as have civil liberties of Serbs in general. Nepotism and corruption in the Serbian
Read more

On the Spanish regional elections of 2023-a warning for progressives

The Spanish regional elections of 2023, especially those in the "Empty Spain" regions far west of the federal capital of Madrid and prosperous yet famously rebellious Catalonia, resulted in a sharp shift towards conservatism and conservative populism. Both Partido Popular (PP, Spain's equivalent of the Conservatives) and Vox (the Spanish equivalent of Reform UK/UKIP) made sweeping gains in all regions, notably taking overall control in Madrid (normally an impossible feat under Spain's PR system), more than doubling their seat total in Valencia to top the poll there, and wresting control of Asturias, La Rioja, and Cantabria from the Spanish Socialist Workers' Party (PSOE, Spain's equivalent of Labour) and the Cantabrian Regionalist Party respectively. Under the tenure of Pedro Sanchez, the current PSOE-Podemos coalition is floundering and has not done much to ensure Spain's recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic since the last restrictions ended in 2021, and P
Read more