My analysis of recent local by-elections (from 12/02/15) and thoughts on reforming party funding

Readers, the results from yesterday's local by-elections were as follows:

Cambridgeshire CC, Bar Hall: Conservative 787 (46.0%, +0.6%), UKIP 251 (14.7%, -7.4%), Liberal Democrat 238 (13.9%, +5.4%), Labour 235 (13.7%, +0.1%), Green 200 (11.7%, +2.3%).

Harlow BC, Mark Hall: Lab 586 (42.6%, +8.2%), UKIP 353 (25.7%, -12.2%), Con 334 (24.3%, +4.5%), Green 55 (4.0%), Lib Dem 47 (3.4%, -4.4%). Changes are since May 2014.

Shropshire UA, Oswestry East: Con 629 (47.5%, +17.0%), Lab 247 (18.6%, -10.2%), Green 231 (17.4%), Lib Dem 218 (16.5%).

Given that none of these wards were that favourable to the Green Party, I believe that once again that we are maintaining our steady support and expanding our horizons. I am pleased to say that with 415 Green PPCs in England and Wales, we are rather close to our '75% of constituencies' target as we speak, and there should be at least 500 Green candidates in constituencies across the United Kingdom by the time the general election campaign officially starts in mid-April.

Also, news of the links between tax avoiding banks (especially HSBC) and party donors in both the Conservative and Labour parties, as well as a recent Conservative Party auction (which featured such items as bronze busts of Margaret Thatcher, and fun runs with Nicky Morgan) which was clearly designed for swelling the Conservatives' already enormous election coffers, shows the need to reform political donations and party funding in Britain.

This is how I believe political party funding in Britain should be reformed:

1. Limit the amount of total donations each political party can receive per year. This will not only help get a level playing field for political parties but also reduce the level of corporate influence in politics (in case we cannot eliminate it completely)

2. Allow political candidates to reclaim some election expenses back after the election (although this should be dependent on the proportion of the votes they receive).

3. Implement state funding for political parties, depending on the levels of support they receive at elections.

4. Lower the election expenses limit per candidate at general elections (e.g. from £30,000 to £20,000) and make sure the expenses limit per candidate for by-elections (currently £100,000!) is lowered to the general election expenses limit.

Regards, Alan.

Comments

  1. Nick13 February 2015 at 14:46

    The by-election limit is frankly obscene and means the party with the most money can effectively buy the election.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

My analysis of the Swedish general election of 2022

The Swedish general election of 2022 generated some surprising results, despite also averting pollsters' predictions significantly. The last three years in particular proved to be a rough ride for the Social Democrat led governments of Stefan Lofven and Magdalena Andersson respectively. Although Sweden's laxer approach to the COVID-19 pandemic (compared to most countries in Europe, which imposed lockdowns during much of 2020 and 2021, an approach that arguably caused more problems than it solved) proved effective, Mr Lofven's desire to lift the austerity tax (which only affected a wealthy minority, similar in nature to the wealth tax initiative of former French President Francois Hollande) and to join NATO proved contentious, with two of the Social Democrats' former coalition partners (the Swedish Greens and Swedish Left Party, who had both pulled out of confidence and supply) unsurprisingly voting against Swedish accession to NATO membership (all other parties in the R
Read more

On the 2020 Serbian election: Why a boycott will only worsen things there

First of all, I apologise for the recent hiatus; however elections are still postponed or on hold in many countries, including the UK. Serbia, however, was able to proceed with its 2020 general election amidst this crisis. Its overall result proved reminiscent of Hungarian elections under Viktor Orban's tenure (2010-present), since the leading national-conservative coalition, the SNS (Progressive Party of Serbia) coalition led by Serbian President Aleksander Vucic (Ana Brnabic is the Serbian Prime Minister, and the first woman and openly homosexual person to hold that position), polled 61.6% of the vote, giving them as many as 191 seats out of 250 and a majority of as high as 132, almost unheard of in any country with proportional representation. Press freedom has endured significant curbs since President Vucic first came into power as Serbian PM in 2012 (he became President of Serbia in 2017), as have civil liberties of Serbs in general. Nepotism and corruption in the Serbian
Read more

On the Spanish regional elections of 2023-a warning for progressives

The Spanish regional elections of 2023, especially those in the "Empty Spain" regions far west of the federal capital of Madrid and prosperous yet famously rebellious Catalonia, resulted in a sharp shift towards conservatism and conservative populism. Both Partido Popular (PP, Spain's equivalent of the Conservatives) and Vox (the Spanish equivalent of Reform UK/UKIP) made sweeping gains in all regions, notably taking overall control in Madrid (normally an impossible feat under Spain's PR system), more than doubling their seat total in Valencia to top the poll there, and wresting control of Asturias, La Rioja, and Cantabria from the Spanish Socialist Workers' Party (PSOE, Spain's equivalent of Labour) and the Cantabrian Regionalist Party respectively. Under the tenure of Pedro Sanchez, the current PSOE-Podemos coalition is floundering and has not done much to ensure Spain's recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic since the last restrictions ended in 2021, and P
Read more